The Task Force Trap: Is Epstein’s "Client List" Being Buried for Good?
Is the new declassification task force a step toward long-awaited truth - or just another way to bury it all? Epstein, JFK, 9/11, and more hang in the balance.
The Task Force
The frenzy surrounding Epstein’s so-called client list has reached new heights yet again - this time fueled by the formation of a new declassification task force. Sparked by President Trump’s Executive Order mandating the release of all remaining classified files related to the assassinations of John F. Kennedy, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and Martin Luther King Jr., the task force was announced during a press conference led by Rep. Anna Paulina Luna. While its original purpose was focused on historic political assassinations such as JFK, RFK Jr., and MLK Jr., , Luna revealed that its scope has been significantly expanded. The task force will now also pursue the declassification of documents related to the UFO/UAP phenomenon, the 9/11 attacks, the origins of the Covid-19 pandemic, and perhaps most explosively, the elusive Epstein client list.
Like many others, I have my doubts about the task force’s intentions, and especially their ability to achieve any of the objectives they have set out to achieve. At the same time, though, I have a hard time bringing myself to believe that the existence of such a task force is inherently a bad thing. It’s one of those situations where, so long as the task force isn’t being erected to serve some yet-unknown destructive purpose, I’d have to say that its probably better to have one than not to have one.
But that’s the key phrase right there: “so long as the task force isn’t being erected to serve some yet-unknown destructive purpose”.
In the week following the task force’s creation, much of the online discourse revolved around skepticism - not just about whether the task force could successfully declassify anything significant, but whether it would accomplish anything at all. The general consensus seemed to be that, even in the best-case scenario where documents are released, they are unlikely to reveal anything we don’t already know. What I didn’t see much discussion about, however, was the reasoning behind the task force’s creation in the first place.
From what I can gather (admittedly, based on the general tone of my X feed), most people - despite their doubts - seem to view this task force as a symbolic win, a kind of partisan leverage. It feels less like a genuine pursuit of truth and more like a mechanism designed to deliver a long-overdue victory to the right, particularly on issues like Epstein, which conservatives have rallied around for years but have struggled to push further, which - in the minds of the partisan right - is due to Trump’s absence from the White House. In other words, it’s being treated as a vehicle for unfinished business - one that, in theory, could force long-suppressed truths into the light, but in practice, may serve more as a political statement than a real reckoning.
I could be completely off the mark here, and maybe the task force was created with righteous intentions, regardless of how doubtful I am about it in general. If exposing long-buried government secrets ends up being used as a political tool, so be it. If the truth is going to come out, I don’t particularly care who releases it.
What concerns me isn’t the task force’s likely failure to accomplish its mission. It’s the possibility that its true purpose is something far more calculated: a way to put these explosive “conspiracy theories” to bed once and for all.
I can already see how this could play out. The task force produces nothing of real substance, just as many skeptics predict - or worse, they outright declare: “We investigated the Epstein client list and found no such list.” This would hand the Establishment the perfect excuse to dismiss further inquiry, allowing them to say, “See? There was nothing there all along. Time to move on.”
In a more insidious scenario, the task force might actually release new documents, but with the caveat that this is all there is - the final word on JFK, Epstein, Covid-19, and 9/11. By framing the disclosures as definitive and exhaustive, they could effectively neutralize any lingering skepticism and shut down further investigation, transforming decades of unanswered questions into settled history overnight.
This might also explain why the task force has taken on such an absurdly broad scope. To claim they’re going to unearth the truth behind not just Epstein, but also 9/11, Covid-19’s origins, the JFK assassination, and the UFO phenomenon all at once is insane. Unless, of course, the real goal isn’t to reveal the full truth about any of them.
Lumping them all together would be a good technique for somebody aiming to dilute the significance of each issue though, or smother all the hype behind them in one sweeping, bureaucratic motion.
Epstein’s “Client List”
One thing that bothered me about the task force announcement was the language Rep. Luna used to describe some of the Epstein documents they’d be looking to obtain.
Last I checked, we already had the names of hundreds of people associated with Epstein in some way between Epstein’s flight logs and his address book, which have been publicly available for years now. What ever happened to those lists? Did I miss several major criminal investigations into those people? Did I somehow miss their trials? Or is it just that there were no investigations into them at all?
Apparently, with the release of this new declassification task force, we’re expected to believe that this time will be different. We’re supposed to believe that the system will suddenly turn against its own and begin naming people.
That’s crazy.
And what’s with the sudden emergence and ubiquitous use of the phrase “client list”, anyway? When and why did we suddenly start referring to the names associated with Epstein as a “client list”? Last I checked, there is no Epstein client list. There is no single, detailed ledger that includes every single one of Epstein’s clients.
At first I was thinking it must just be a sort of short hand way of referring to the names on Epstein’s flight logs and in his address book, and I’m sure it’s used in that way plenty of times. But when I heard Rep. Luna say at the press conference that they’d be looking for this supposed client list, I started to think - “what happens when they don’t find it?”
Because they won’t find it, it doesn’t exist. What likely exists is a slew of names that we have yet to hear come up in connection with Epstein scattered across a plethora of unrelated documents, ranging from bank records to receipts to camera footage to journals to photographs and so on. I find it crazy that people believe that a criminal, in the midst of a multi-decade child trafficking operation, kept a detailed ledger of every single high profile person that committed unspeakable crimes with Epstein. I also find it crazy that people believe that if such a list existed, that they’d ever release it to us.
I did some digging into when and how the “Epstein client list” terminology first emerged, and I discovered that it wasn’t used at all before 2023. Before that point, people would just refer to Epstein’s flight logs and address book separately when talking about lists of names connected to Epstein. Now, however, everything has changed - I turn on the news and see even them referring to Epstein’s supposed “client list”, as if the flight logs never existed and aren’t already publicly available.
The sudden appearance and universal adoption of the “client list” verbiage feels deliberate. What’s sketchy about it is that it’s restrictive language, and it has the effect of narrowing the scope of inquiry rather than broadening it, which is what we should be doing. We should be asking, who else was involved? - not limiting ourselves to searching for a single list of clients that may not even exist. We should be asking, what has been done with the names we already know were involved with Epstein?
The more we talk about a hypothetical “client list”, the more we guide people away from asking about the lists we already do have, and what’s been done with the people on those.
The Forces We’re Up Against
Like I said before, I could be way off the mark on my suspicions of the task force. It could very well be that the task force is simply a political move used to rile up the right wing demographic and further cement support for Trump’s administration and the broader movement in general. As shitty as that is, maybe the task force wasn’t erected to serve any sort of malicious purpose like I speculated about above.
If that’s the case, we’re still dealing with a task force that will more than likely be unable to give us anything of substance. We need to remember that the people in power who have not only successfully buried the truth about Epstein for decades but actively protected him from prosecution aren’t about to roll over and start handing out sealed indictments because a task force with no subpoena power has suited up and started looking into them.
In case you have forgotten, the available evidence suggests that They™️fucking killed him in front of the entire nation to keep his secrets from getting out.
Cameras malfunctioned. Guards fell asleep. Logs were erased.
And it all happened inside Manhattan’s Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) - a federal prison under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ).
At the time, the DOJ was led by Attorney General William Barr, who had been appointed by Trump. Meaning, Barr and the DOJ were responsible for overseeing federal prisons - including the one where Epstein "died."
Bottom line? Epstein died on Trump’s watch.
Who gave the directive to start this declassification task force again? Trump, it started with his Executive Order. Whose side appears to be spearheading it? Trump’s side (although it is technically a bipartisan effort). We all know that it is mostly right wing conservatives calling for arrests in connection to the Epstein case.
But it gets even worse than that, and for those of you that have read enough into all this material, you will know exactly where I’m going with this. The fact is, stories like this one tend to run much deeper than what we’re usually told.
What I mean by that is Attorney General Bill Barr’s father, Donald Barr, was the headmaster of the prestigious Dalton School in New York in the 1970s, an elite prep school attended by the offspring of wealthy and influential families. But he was the one that hired Jeffrey Epstein as a math and physics teacher despite the fact that Epstein didn’t even have a college degree.
Let me put it in perspective: if you lived anywhere near where Epstein lived or frequented at the peak of his activity, it could’ve been your daughter getting assaulted by Epstein and then driven home just before he leaves to catch a flight to Israel to see the prime minister and get a private tour of the Iron Dome, Israel’s missile defense system, or visiting the White House to see Bill Clinton, or taking a vacation to Balmoral Castle, Queen Elizabeth II’s estate.
Epstein wasn’t just rich - he was connected. He wasn’t just connected - he was powerful. His tendrils extended into global finance, elite universities, the highest levels of government, and even intelligence agencies like the Mossad.
But it wasn’t just blackmail. Epstein was a financier of power. His money flowed into scientific institutions, elite universities, and even government programs.
His ties to intelligence agencies are severely downplayed in the media, and because of that, most people don’t realize the implications of that. I mean, these are the same entities that overthrow entire nations and force regime change around the world, and these are the people Epstein was deeply intertwined with.
And it may not be that he was only intertwined with them, even - based on the information that he have on Epstein already, it’s pretty clear that there is a high likelihood that Epstein was working for the Israeli intelligence agency Mossad, allegedly running a honeytrap (sexual blackmail) operation to blackmail powerful figures using children. He might’ve been working for multiple agencies.
We also know that Ghislaine Maxwell’s father was a Mossad asset himself!
Epstein’s case isn’t just about wealthy and powerful men exploiting minors on a secluded island. The sheer scope of his connections elevates it to a national security issue. Given the caliber of individuals he surrounded himself with - politicians, intelligence figures, and industry elites - the potential geopolitical fallout from his hidden camera footage could be massive. If such footage were to implicate a world leader or someone with significant influence over global affairs, the consequences could ripple far beyond just exposing individual crimes.
Case in point: Epstein visited the White House 17 times during Bill Clinton’s presidency (that we know about). I mean, what is going on there that is so important that it requires so many personal visits? There are many people that, at all times, would kill to have 5 minutes with the president. For Epstein, it wasn’t even an obstacle.
Also, Epstein’s attorney, Gerald B. Lefcourt, publicly stated that Epstein had a role in actually creating the Clinton Foundation.
And the White House staffer responsible for admitting Jeffrey Epstein into the building to see Clinton? That would be Mark Middleton, a former special assistant to President Bill Clinton. Records show he authorized multiple Epstein visits to the White House in the 1990s - at least 17 times between 1993 and 1995. But Middleton is dead now. Authorities ruled his death a suicide after he was found hanging from a tree with an extension cord around his neck and a shotgun wound to the chest at the Heifer Ranch in Perryville, Arkansas.
And let’s not forget Epstein’s uncanny ability to dodge law enforcement, which was plainly demonstrated by Epstein in response to the police raid on his Palm Beach home in 2005. Testimony from those connected to that investigation have said that Epstein had preemptively labeled certain items with “Do not take” notes - clearly suggesting that he had been tipped off to the raid ahead of time.
What kind of criminal operates with such confidence that they assume they can tell the police what not to confiscate?
A criminal who knows that the system is rigged in their favor, and knows that they are being actively protected.
In the batch of Epstein documents published on the FBI’s online Vault on 5/24/18, there’s an excerpt that states: "Epstein has also provided information to the FBI as agreed upon."
As we know, Epstein got his “sweetheart deal” not long after this. In other words, it could be that Epstein was an FBI Informant for Mueller’s FBI for a time, and it could be that this is the reason why he was able to escape such serious charges for molesting over 20 girls.
Based on the publicly available information we have access to already, there are a lot of reasons to be asking questions about the degree of protection Epstein had throughout his criminal career. And with the creation of this new task force, there’s a lot of reasons to be questioning whether those same entities have reason to protect him and his clients even now.
Remember, all this talk about the “client list” and who else was involved with Epstein - many of those people are still occupying their positions, and many of those people are in our government.
Trouble Brewing: FBI Deleting Epstein Files? Pam Bondi Delays?
This week, the conversation around Epstein and his supposed “client list” surged again after Attorney General Pam Bondi appeared in a few interviews discussing the ongoing probe. In those interviews, AG Bondi attracted a lot of attention after she stated that she straight up had Epstein-related documents on her desk at that very moment, and planned to release them imminently:
Pam Bondi is tasked with collaborating closely with Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, National Security Advisor Michael Waltz, and White House Counsel David Warrington, and their collective responsibility revolves around developing comprehensive plans for the full release of these records within specific timeframes. This task is apparently the first thing on her plate, as Bondi was just confirmed in early February.
However, nothing has happened since these interviews, or the creation of the task force. Apparently, the Epstein files are still on Bondi’s desk, waiting to be released.
Yesterday, Rep. Luna posted the following on X, remarking on the delay:
She isn’t the only person commenting on the delay. Just about every prominent figure in the conservative community on X is calling Bondi out for the hold up.
Right now, the general consensus is that it’s hard not to view this delay as yet another example of stonewalling.
FBI Deleting Files
Meanwhile, as concerns about Bondi and the delays regarding the Epstein files, trouble is unfolding in another dimension of this story: according to Michael Schellenberger, he was contacted by an FBI whistleblower and told that FBI employees are actively destroying evidence related to the Jeffrey Epstein case and the JFK assassination. Currently, this story is dominating all Epstein-related discussions happening about Epstein.
One person that has been a major focus over the last few weeks has been Kash Patel, who was just sworn in as the the FBI’s new Director. He’s made wildly candid statements in the past about Epstein and the JFK assassination, signaling a willingness to “go all in” on these cases, becoming a fast favorite among the right wing conservative crowd and especially the conspiracy theorists and truthers that have put their full support behind Rep. Luna, AG Bondi, and the task force’s efforts in general.
I do find the timing of Kash Patel’s swearing-in and the FBI’s alleged destruction of Epstein-related files to be a bit curious. We have the creation of this new task force that swears it’ll get to the bottom of and release all files pertaining to Epstein and the other cases, Pam Bondi is then confirmed as the new Attorney General, Kash Patel becomes the new FBI Director, and shortly after that, Rep. Luna (as head of the task force) publicly states that the DOJ is not responding to their requests for status updates on the files.
I don’t know. I don’t know what to think about all this. Maybe the task force is a well-intentioned entity headed up by somebody with equally righteous intentions. Or, maybe the entire thing is being set up to neutralize the hype around these “conspiracy theories”. Or, perhaps it’s all just a short term political play to energize the conservative base by creating the illusion that they’re doing exactly what we have wanted them to do for years now.
I just think that the people who have blindly put their faith into this task force are woefully misinformed about how deeply rooted the Epstein story goes. The Epstein story is a national security issue. Because of that, and because of how recent his arrest was, the chances of releasing the Establishment actually coming through and releasing everything they have on him flies in the face of everything we know the Establishment to be.
They don’t spend decades ruthlessly covering up the crimes of a billionaire pedophile and then suddenly turn around and be 100% transparent about the whole thing, not even a new administration is in the White House.
However, that isn’t an excuse to throw our arms up and just give up trying to get to the bottom of the Epstein case. I don’t even want to advise you guys to not trust the task force, or be hopeful for their success. What I do want to do, though, is to remind you guys to be cautious about all this. We know how these things end up. Obstacles always appear, processes are always stopped. Somehow, some way. It’s just the nature of the process when we’re dealing with stories that run as deep as the Epstein case, or the JFK assassination. There are truly people out there that want this information buried forever, and given the echelons of power they occupy, it’s probably wise of us to approach the task force (and the people associated with it) with a healthy degree of skepticism and caution.
Thanks for reading.
🔗 ALL my links:
LinkTr.ee/TheMemoryHold
💰SUPPORT MY WORK
If you enjoy my content and would like to support my channel, you can make a donation using any of the following platforms:
CashApp: $MemoryHold
Venmo: @MemoryHold
PayPal: paypal.me/memoryhold7707
Patreon: patreon.com/Memoryhold] (Support for as little as $1/mo)
Rokfin: Rokfin.com/memoryhold
🌐 CONNECT WITH ME:
Instagram: @Lil_Falseflag
X: @YungNorthwoods
TikTok: @MemoryHold1
RFK Jr. wasn't assassinated. Author surely needs a credibility check.
And NOW 🥁🥁👉🏼Phase 2 https://youtu.be/yhvfsIsF2lw?si=nGdVG_LIoSYZyydF