Playback speed
×
Share post
Share post at current time
0:00
/
0:00
Transcript
2

Clinton Warns of 'October Surprise' & Mentions PIZZAGATE; 100 New Diddy Accusers come Forward

Shownotes for my most recent video where I discuss the new accusers coming forward in the Diddy case, and some controversial statements Hillary Clinton recently made.
2

Watch on Youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/live/ql0cRskGGns?si=vwnowbFd2pMYSwjo

Watch on Rokfin:
https://rokfin.com/post/189230/100-new-Diddy-Accusers-Clinton-Warns-of-October-Surprise-Targeting-Harris-mentions-PIZZAGATE

🔗 ALL my links: LinkTr.ee/TheMemoryHold

Book mark the above LinkTree link to keep track of me and my work! Given the tumultuous state of our present digital environment, my videos and research can be removed from legacy platforms at any time, and I’m constantly at risk of being banned. Bookmarking the LinkTree page ensures that we never lose track of eachother!

💰SUPPORT MY WORK

If you enjoy my content and would like to support my channel, you can make a donation using any of the following platforms:

  • CashApp: $MemoryHold

  • Venmo: @MemoryHold

  • PayPal: paypal.me/memoryhold7707

  • Patreon: patreon.com/Memoryhold] (Support for as little as $1/mo)

  • Rokfin: Rokfin.com/memoryhold

🌐 CONNECT WITH ME:

  • Instagram: @Lil_Falseflag  

  • X: @YungNorthwoods

  • TikTok: @MemoryHold1 

VIDEO OVERVIEW:

A rough outline of what I cover in this video.

PART ONE:

Hillary Clinton 'October Surprise' & Pizzagate

  • Clinton warns of a potential 'October Surprise' type incident targeting Kamala Harris; brings up Pizzagate as an example of a similar coordinated campaign that the Russians were (supposedly) behind

  • We watch the clip together, and I dissect her statements:

  • Clinton talks about how today, stories break on the Internet first, and then get picked up by outlets like Fox that spread the misinformation further, lending it legitimacy

  • I briefly describe the more broad, overarching agenda of crushing “alternative information” that originates from outside the mainstream sphere

PART TWO:

Diddy: New Lawsuits, Kim Porter Memoir

  • New lawsuits coming; over 100 people come forward claiming to be victims, and the crimes span over 20 years

  • Attorney press conference announcing the new lawsuits

  • Kim Porter's "fake" memoir removed from Amazon

  • Author speaks about; claims to have Diddy tapes

  • Jaguar Wright claims -- Jay-Z, Diddy Tapes & more


Hillary Clinton ‘October Surprise’ Warning

On September 27, 2024, during a high-profile interview at the Clinton Global Initiative's annual meeting in New York City, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton issued a cautionary statement regarding the imminent threat of an "October surprise" that has the potential to distort and undermine Harris’s image and reputation, and undermine her campaign at this critical juncture of the process.

Clinton, speaking with "Firing Line" host Margaret Hoover, articulated her apprehensions about concerted efforts to "distort and pervert" Harris's identity, values, and accomplishments. Drawing parallels to her own experiences during the 2016 campaign, Clinton invoked the infamous "Pizzagate" conspiracy theory as a cautionary exemplar of how misinformation can proliferate and influence public discourse; in those circumstances, it was John Podesta’s supposedly hacked emails that spawned Pizzagate, and would ultimately completely obliterating Clinton’s entire presidential campaign, resulting in a history-making upset; a loss against all odds.

The video clip of Clinton making this statement is currently making the rounds on social media. For your convenience, I have included the short clip of her statement below:

When following up on stories such as this one, it’s critical that you also make sure to check the actual source video itself; the original video that was edited and shared by everybody else, spurring its virality online. Videos can be edited out of context and manipulated to make people appear as if they’re saying all sorts of outrageous things, and it’s surprisingly easy to be duped by the slick or subtle editing of content creators trying to spin a message, no matter how experienced you may be.

Here’s the video of her interview with Margaret Hoover at Firing Line; you can click the link here to watch, or you can watch by clicking the embedded video below. The statement begins around 24:00 in.

This is Clinton’s full statement:

“So you look at where people get their information, and they get their information largely from social media. And so the campaign is doing the best job it can to combat that, combat both domestic and foreign false disinformation. But I anticipate there will be a full-court press in October. The digital airwaves will be filled.

Oftentimes stories are put on digitally that then are picked up by, let's say it, Fox and others. And then those stories are stories, so the mainstream press reports on them. And so that story then takes on a life of its own. There will be concerted efforts to distort and pervert Kamala Harris, who she is, what she stands for, what she's done.

I mean, look, I mean, the crazy story about me running a child trafficking operation out of a basement of a pizzeria. (audience laughs) Don't laugh, don't laugh. It was a huge story. And it got one young man in North Carolina to get in his car with his, you know, assault rifle and drive up to liberate these nonexistent children and shoot up a pizzeria in Washington, D.C..

This is dangerous stuff. It starts online, often on the dark web. Then it migrates. It's picked up by the pro-Trump media. It's then reported on by everybody else, which makes sure it has about 100% coverage, and people believe it. So I don't know what it's going to be, but it will be something, and we'll have to work very, very hard to make sure that it is exposed as the lie that it is.”

Right now, this video clip is being shared all over X and social media, but it appears that many people are misunderstanding exactly what was said in it, and are sharing the clip as if it’s proof that Clinton knows for sure that damaging information on Kamala Harris is set to be released as an ‘October Surprise’.

While I don’t think it’s outrageous to believe that Clinton has some type of insider knowledge on this matter or that sources behind the scenes are informing her about something that is to come, I don’t think she is referring to a specific threat or piece of damaging information here; if you listen to her carefully, you’ll hear that the language she uses is very generalized, and she does not claim to be aware of any piece of specific information that is set to take down Harris ‘October Surprise’-style. What she said is more of a generalized statement about the subversive activity that our adversaries are likely going to engage in during the lead-up to our elections.

Basically, she’s saying that she knows that these types of influence campaigns are happening all the time, and therefore she is expecting that the Russians will likely attempt to pull off another campaign that tries to destroy Harris’s campaign in the same way Clinton’s was destroyed in 2016. It’s just that, to them (and the Establishment as a whole), attribute all of it to Russia, who is spreading information that (once again, to them) is all fake….when we know that isn’t true.

Still Butthurt over Pizzagate

Regardless of the above, the fact that Clinton actually had the guts to bring up Pizzagate in this interview at all astonishes me, especially with the general idea of ‘Elite Human Trafficking’ becoming more prominent then ever, and the conversation back in the news cycle following the arrest of music mogul P. Diddy on a slew of charges that includes Human Trafficking.

Naturally, her mention of the supposedly debunked conspiracy theory illicits immediate laughter from the crowd, to which she tells them to stop laughing because it’s a very serious matter. She uses this moment to stress the danger of misinformation and disinformation, and the power that narratives hold in shaping politics and elections. Her comment about an ‘October Surprise’ targeting Kamala serves as a strategic warning, broad yet deliberate, aimed at preemptively discrediting any information emerging from alternative media sources. It subtly reinforces the notion that such narratives are inherently damaging to the democratic process, casting them as threats not only to political integrity but to democracy itself.

This tactic was also used behind the scenes before the Hunter Biden laptop scandal hit the news as well. If you recall, over a year after the laptop scandal went down, it was revealed that the FBI had been aware of the impending laptop leak far in advance of its contents actually being publicized. In the months leading up to the 2020 election, the FBI warned social media companies about the possibility of a "hack and leak" operation by foreign actors, particularly Russians.

At that time, none of us were aware that these warnings were being circulated or that Hunter Biden’s laptop was about to be released. Once this information came to light, it shed new clarity on the actions taken by social media platforms immediately following the laptop’s emergence: specific keywords were blacklisted, a media blackout ensured that no mainstream outlet covered the story, and anyone attempting to share links to the laptop’s contents on Twitter, Facebook, or other platforms faced either shadowbanning or outright bans. These measures were all justified under the pretext of combating misinformation and conspiracy theories.

Because social media companies were preemptively warned to expect a malicious campaign aimed at swaying the 2020 election through Hunter’s incriminating files, it effectively turned into a ‘shoot on sight’ policy, where any reference to the laptop was aggressively suppressed to prevent the spread of what they believed—or were told to believe—was part of a disinformation operation. Users on Twitter were even prevented from sending links to the contents via Direct Messages, and direct links to the brave news outlets that did cover the story (such as the NY Post) were also banned from search engines and social media. Mark Zuckerberg even states that the warning he received from the FBI about the laptop story was what prompted the Orwellian censorship we saw on Facebook around the story.

Some time after that, A few years later, it came to light that the very individuals who had sounded the alarm about a supposed ‘Russian hack and leak’ operation targeting Hunter Biden knew all along that the contents of his laptop had no connection to any foreign hack, or were at least not entirely fabricated by an adversary like Russia.

That is just one of many stories just like it, and in this video clip, it’s evidence that Clinton’s comments in the video clip mirror this same tactic; she’s laying the groundwork to discredit any damaging revelations about Harris that may surface before the election, preemptively framing them as products of foreign influence campaigns and, therefore, not to be believed.

As we know, this perspective has been the leading approach to the misinformation and disinformation debate since at least 2016, and it gained even more momentum after the rise of the Pizzagate conspiracy. Pizzagate spread rapidly across online platforms until eventually, in early December of 2016, the situation escalated when a gunman entered Comet Ping Pong, the pizzeria at the center of the theory, armed and intent on rescuing the children he believed were being held there. This incident, sparked solely by an online narrative, spurred the perfect opportunity for the Establishment to seize on this example of conspiracy-caused violence as the perfect justification to initiate their overarching, multi-year agenda of clamping down on information that is generated and shared outside of the authoritative mainstream sphere.

  1. ME running a child trafficking operation out of a pizza place

    1. We never said it was HER PERSONALLY

    2. They use this fabricated detail (along with the “but Comet doesn’t have a basement!”)

Jailtime for Spreading Misinformation?

I didn’t get to cover this in the video, but I wanted to at least touch on it briefly, so I’m mentioning it here.

Clinton’s warning about an impending ‘October Surprise’ facing Kamala Harris emerged just one month after she found herself under fire from right wingers and ‘conspiracy theorists’ for a similar statement that she made. In this instance, this time, video clips circulated widely on X, and showed Clinton suggesting that even American citizens could face jail time for spreading misinformation.

The clip in question was posted by End Wokeness on X.

These are certainly alarming statements, at least in my opinion; as somebody who has lost a lot of my online following over the years as a direct result of the misinformation mitigation efforts that Clinton is calling for in both videos; the efforts that began when Welch stormed into Comet Ping Pong with an AR-15 in 2016 and continuously built upon and implemented over time by the Establishment following the advent of Q and the Covid-19 pandemic—each providing excellent opportunities to justify more extensive crack-downs on information and the alternative media space that shares it.

However, let’s go back to what I said earlier about the potential for deceptive editing in videos like this. While the verbiage used by Clinton in the short video clip above absolutely seems to call for the jailing of American citizens who spread misinformation and participate in foreign influence campaigns, we have to be aware that, once again, we are not working with the full video here.

To get the full context and really ensure that this is truly what she is advocating for, we have to take a look at the original source video that these clips came from to begin with. In this case, the clips come from a segment Clinton did with Rachel Maddow recently titled "Clinton: Take Trump at his word and be outraged by what he represents”, and can be viewed below.

The quotes from the above video begins at 7:50 in the full video, but go back further and start the video from 7:00 (or from the beginning, ideally!) so you have the full context on what she is talking about before she even says the things she says in the video above. Here’s the video:

Here’s the full quote:

They are using Americans, both those who are witting and willing, and those who are unwitting and are just so surprised they’re getting $400,000 a week or $100,000 a podcast to parrot Kremlin propaganda. And we know, from what even Republicans have said—the chairs of the Intelligence Committee and the Foreign Affairs Committee, and other Republicans who are currently in office—that Republicans go to the floor of Congress and they parrot Russian talking points.

So, I think it’s important to indict the Russians, just as Mueller indicted a lot of Russians who were engaged in direct election interference and boosting Trump back in 2016. But I also think there are Americans who are engaged in this kind of propaganda. Whether they should be civilly or, in some cases, even criminally charged is something that would serve as a better deterrence, because the Russians are unlikely, except in very few cases, to ever stand trial in the United States.

It doesn’t matter

I wanted to clarify the above because I believe it's crucial to be thorough with the information we share and the facts we claim to understand. In my view, it's clear that Clinton is either being misunderstood or deliberately taken out of context by many who are circulating these clips throughout right wing spaces. Regarding the controversy surrounding her two statements, in both videos I shared above, Clinton's words are either being misrepresented or edited in a way that changes the meaning, especially in the context of Pizzagate and the so-called 'October Surprise' discussions.

But that doesn’t matter.

The fact remains: the disgustingly broad and pervasive censorship machine being promoted by Clinton and the Establishment is only getting stronger, more powerful, and even more capable of detecting and eradicating certain types of content that fits their criteria for deletion, suspension, whatever. It doesn’t matter if Clinton was taken out of context while in the process of promoting such nonsense.

I know it seems kind of silly to harp on such a small detail when dealing with the truly existential threat of censorship we are currently facing, but I wanted to hang on this for a bit because, poetically, us sharing these viral clips of Clinton’s interviews and fueling the controversy further only goes to prove her point further if the videos we are sharing in order to do that are fake, edited deceptively, taken out of context, and so on.

It really is easy to be deceived by clever video editing and trickery; many of the techniques employed by the creators of these clips are often subtle and difficult to notice right away, especially if you’re mindlessly doom scrolling or just casually scrolling for fun while temporarily occupied with something. It happens to all of us, and it happens to me! It’s a fact of life now. Of course, I will say that you and I are probably a bit more resistant to such fakery, having studied how it works for so long.

As a species with access to this phone, we have an undying tendency to broadcast straight up bullshit, verifiably false information. We just do it. Even if we know it’s fake and retweet it to show your followers how laughably fake it is, there’s probably going to be one brain dead sleepwalker that ends up seeing it and truly believing that whatever it is, is real.

So, I don’t want my stance on this to be misconstrued: it’s not that Hillary Clinton and the Establishment is completely wrong about the danger of misinformation and disinformation; it’s just that we define misinformation and disinformation differently than what the Establishment currently has it defined as. They believe in and advocate for wide-sweeping, pervasive misinformation crack-downs targeting alternative media sources and those that consume it as purveyors of the information that harms people, such as anti-vaccine rhetoric, or child abuse conspiracy theories that drive people to act violently toward those targeted by the theories.

Based on the type of content being obliterated under these new anti-misinformation initiatives, a better definition of misinformation (according to the Establishment) could be "Information that is true, but too inconvenient for our mainstream, authoritative Establishment”.

Just as the NATO Cognitive Warfare documents said: we are all “beacons” that can consume and also spread harmful contagion-like information that ‘infects’ those around us. Even if we strive for neutrality, the sheer act of consuming modern information is enough to be viewed as a potential weapon—a carrier of a virus. We are infected, and capable of transmitting that ‘virus’ (knowledge) to others. Hence, the WHO came up with ‘Infodemic’ to describe it.

An Infodemic is defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as an overabundance of information, including false or misleading information, during a disease outbreak. This excess of information can cause confusion, risk-taking behaviors, and mistrust in health authorities, ultimately undermining public health responses. The term "infodemic" combines "information" and "epidemic," highlighting the parallel between the spread of disease and the rapid dissemination of information in our increasingly digitized world.

To address this challenge, WHO has prioritized infodemic management, which involves the systematic use of risk- and evidence-based approaches to manage infodemics and reduce their impact on health behaviors during health emergencies.

They are taking the pandemic response template, and applying it to ‘misinformation’. Treating ‘misinformation’ like a contagion is the framework they are using to justify a comprehensive shut down of unsanctioned information.


PART TWO: OVER 100 NEW VICTIMS COME FORWARD ALLEGING ABUSE BY DIDDY

Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs is facing a deluge of new allegations of assault in a series of civil lawsuits set to be filed against him. At a press conference held on Tuesday, Texas-based attorney Tony Buzbee revealed that he is representing 120 accusers with claims spanning over two decades, which paint a disturbing picture of systemic abuse within the entertainment industry.

“We will expose the enablers who allowed this conduct to persist behind closed doors. We will pursue this matter no matter who the evidence implicates,” Buzbee stated firmly during the press conference. “Many powerful people … many dirty secrets,” he continued, suggesting that the allegations may touch on not just Combs’ conduct, but on a wider network of individuals who may have facilitated or turned a blind eye to these incidents. According to Buzbee, his team has amassed a collection of pictures, video recordings, and text messages, all of which he claims support the allegations made against the music mogul.

Among these accusations is a particularly troubling incident involving a young person, referred to as “nein yur old,” which allegedly occurred during an audition for a record deal with Combs’ Bad Boy Records. The incident, Buzbee said, took place in New York City, where several minors were present, all vying for opportunities in the music industry. “This isn’t just about one individual, but a pattern of behavior that took place over decades,” Buzbee asserted.

This claim is just one piece of a broader, more damning portrait being painted against Combs, who was arrested last month on a series of serious charges, including sex trafficking and racketeering. Though the federal indictment against Combs does not explicitly mention minors, it outlines a litany of abuses against “women and other individuals,” encompassing verbal, emotional, physical, and sexual misconduct. The charges also include sex trafficking, forced labor, interstate transportation for prostitution, coercion, bribery, and obstruction of justice.

Buzbee, a prominent Houston-based attorney known for his work in high-profile cases, emphasized that these lawsuits will be filed within 30 days and that his firm has received over 3,000 phone calls from potential clients since announcing his legal action against Combs. He currently represents at least 24 individuals, many of whom were minors at the time of the alleged abuse. “We’re committed to protecting the identities of these survivors, ensuring that their voices are heard without further trauma,” Buzbee added.

As of now, no concrete evidence has been made public by Buzbee to substantiate the new claims, and Combs’ defense attorney has yet to respond to these latest developments. However, Buzbee’s comments hint at a broader investigation that may implicate others within the entertainment world who were complicit in these alleged abuses.

Attorney Tony Buzzbee announcing new accusers at press conference:

https://www.today.com/popculture/news/sean-diddy-combs-120-sexual-assault-allegations-rcna173502
- Archive:

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/sean-diddy-combs-indicted-charges-sex-trafficking-racketeering-rcna171427

Diddy is facing dozens of new allegations of sexual assault in a series of civil lawsuits set to be filed.

At a press conference held on Tuesday, Texas-based attorney Tony Buzbee said he is representing 120 accusers with allegations against the entertainment mogul that occurred over 20 years.

“We will expose the enablers who enabled this conduct behind closed doors. We will pursue this matter no matter who the evidence implicates,” Buzbee said during the press conference.

“Many powerful people ... many dirty secrets,” the lawyer said of the allegations. He added that his team has “collected pictures, video, texts.”

Buzbee added that the allegations will include: “violent sexual assault or rape, facilitated sex with a controlled substance, dissemination of video recordings, sexual abuse of minors.”

Diddy Allegedly Assaulted a 9-Year Old

https://archive.is/7wK2a

Kim Porter Memoir Controversy

The controversy surrounding Kim Porter, her relationship with Sean "Diddy" Combs, and her untimely death has been reignited by the release and subsequent removal of a purported memoir titled "Kim's Lost Words: A Journey for Justice, from the Other Side", which was released last month.

The book, published under the pseudonym Jamal T. Millwood, claimed to offer intimate details about Porter's life and her relationship with Diddy. The author, Christopher Todd Guzze, claimed that the memoir was based off of Kim Porter's diary.

Todd told Rolling Stone that two sources close to Diddy and Porter contacted him after Diddy's ex Cassie Ventura filed her lawsuit against him in November 2023, and provided him with a "flash drive, documents, and tapes" from Kim Porter, which he used to assemble the now-banned memoir.

"They said they had her flash drive. I didn't ask too many questions about how they got it or where did it come from."

Published shortly after Diddy's arrest, the 59-page book appeared on Amazon. Shortly after that, the Daily Mail published an article supporting the book, titled "Diddy's debauched life of threesomes and unspeakable violence exposed in gory tell-all book from Kim Porter

According to the Associated Press, the book briefly topped Amazon's best selling books list.

Porter’s children, Quincy, Christian, Jessie and D’Lila, denounced the book as a complete fabrication in a collective statement on Instagram late Tuesday. They vehemently deny the memoir's authenticity, and state that their mother never wrote such a book.

Following the backlash, Amazon and other major bookstores have removed the book from their shelves. The author, Chris Todd, claims he received the content from music industry insiders but cannot verify its authenticity.

Specific inaccuracies claimed by Porter's family include:

  1. 1. The book's very existence - they assert Porter never wrote a memoir.

  2. 2. Allegations of abuse by Diddy - the family states these are fabricated.

  3. 3. Claims of foul play in Porter's death - her children maintain there was no foul play involved.

  4. 4. Intimate details of Porter's personal life - described as "hurtful and false" by her children.

The timing of the book's release as it corresponds to Diddy's arrest and the capitalization on the untimely death of one of his ex-girlfriends, Kim Porter, makes it no surprise that the book generated significant buzz, and still is. Further amplifying the conversation around the book, though, are the 'conspiracy theorists' that wonder whether the book really is a fake, or if it truly represents a true story as told by Kim Porter.

Regardless, the fact remains: there is no verifiable facts to back up what the author of the memoir is claiming within it, nor is there any evidence to bolster his claims of possessing flash drives, documents, and other things from Kim Porter. There isn't anything to verify the claims that Kim Porter was trying to reveal Diddy's sex trafficking operation at all, as far as I can tell.

As for whether Christopher Todd...:

"If somebody put my feet to the fire and they said, ‘Life or death, is that book real?’ I have to say I don't know. But it’s real enough to me. Sometimes you have to just put it out there. Maybe not 100 per cent of the book is true, but maybe 80 per cent is. That is to get those people to come forward and either corroborate or deny [the claims], and that helps me as an investigator to know the truth."

Issues with the book/Todd's claims:

  1. The use of "Jamal" as a pseudonym (leveraging the attention from the black demographic?)

  2. The timing of the book's release (right after Diddy's arrest); capitalizing off of Diddy's crimes

  3. No confirmation or proof that he possesses flash drives or any tapes related to Diddy

  4. No names are given for the source that supposedly provided Todd with all of this information

  5. Made sketchy claims about ‘solving high profile murders’ that he has no record of being involved in

Al B. Sure!, father of Kim Porter’s son Quincy, has further complicated the narrative surrounding her death by publicly calling for a new investigation, strongly suggesting that he believes her passing was not due to natural causes. Despite his suspicions, he has also joined others in condemning the recently released memoir, dismissing it as a complete fabrication rife with falsehoods and inaccuracies.

Kim Porter’s Memoir Pulled from Amazon

Alleged ‘memoir’ from Diddy’s ex-partner Kim Porter pulled from Amazon (10/1/24) | The Washington Post
https://archive.ph/9sEvO

Instagram Post by Kim Porter's kids denouncing Christopher Todd's book on Porter:

A post shared by @quincy

Singer Al B. Sure! Wants Authorities to Investigate Death of Diddy’s Ex Kim Porter
https://archive.ph/cJlf6

Al B. Sure Says there's evidence that Kim Porter's Death was Murder | Instagram (7/13/2020)

A post shared by @hiphollywood

In an emotional post made on Instagram, Al B. Sure reflects on the moment he learned of Kim Porter’s death. He explains that he was on his way to film pre-production for the BET Awards when he received a call from PR icon Queenie Donaldson, informing him of the tragic news. He expresses disbelief, asserting that Kim Porter didn’t just pass away suddenly from pneumonia, and suggests foul play. He notes that they had just celebrated their son Quincy’s new deal and Christmas special with Netflix, and recalls Kim being in good health and good spirits at the time. Al B. Sure! ends the post by expressing his suspicion and frustration.

MEMOIR AUTHOR CHRISTOPHER TODD GUZZE SPEAKS OUT

I first found out about the interview Christopher Todd did after I came across the following post on X by Shadow of Ezra:

X - Shadow of Ezra video clip:
https://x.com/ShadowofEzra/status/1841458296005210163

"The author of Kim Porter's book has made a bombshell claim about Diddy's tapes, stating they could take down Hollywood and the entire entertainment industry.

He disclosed that some of the tapes were secretly flown out of the country on a private jet, while numerous others still exist, documenting 30 years' worth of shocking recordings."

The above clip is taken from the longer video of Todd’s interview, which you can watch here at this link.

The video features an interview with Christopher Todd, the author of a controversial memoir allegedly written by Kim Porter. The memoir, which includes explosive claims about Porter, Diddy, and other celebrities, has been met with severe backlash. Porter’s family and associates have denounced the book as fictitious, while Todd insists he has the right to publish it.

He repeatedly refers to a flash drive containing sensitive information, including alleged sex tapes and hidden footage, but has not provided any concrete proof. Legal threats have emerged from several individuals mentioned in the memoir, as Todd grapples with accusations of defamation and attempts to validate his claims.

The conversation primarily revolves around ongoing disputes over the timeline of events, authenticity of sources, and Todd’s rationale for including salacious details without direct evidence.

Legal threats have emerged from several individuals mentioned in the memoir, as Todd grapples with accusations of defamation and attempts to validate his claims.

The conversation primarily revolves around ongoing disputes over the timeline of events, authenticity of sources, and Todd’s rationale for including salacious details without direct evidence.

  • 7:00: Christopher Todd is confronted about claims of inaccuracies in the memoir; author remarks "they don't have access to the flash drive, does she?"

Most important parts of this video:

  • He repeatedly refers to a flash drive containing sensitive information, including alleged sex tapes and hidden footage, but has not provided any concrete proof.

Diddy Tapes

The video frequently references alleged tapes involving Sean “Diddy” Combs and other celebrities. Todd claims that Kim Porter had copies of these tapes as a form of leverage against Diddy, including possible recordings of high-profile encounters. He describes a supposed vault where these tapes were kept and mentions that some tapes might have been flown out of the country. Despite these sensational allegations, Todd has not released any footage and only hints at their existence.

He also suggests that other people have seen these tapes and are threatening to leak them, but he refrains from disclosing details about the footage or confirming their authenticity. The lack of verifiable evidence has raised skepticism about the entire narrative, and Todd’s evasiveness during the interview deepens the controversy surrounding these allegations.

Jaguar Wright Claims about Jay-Z and Diddy:

Pierce Morgan interviewing Jaguar Wright - (VIDEO)
https://x.com/iamsho_nuff/status/1841587727763898505?s=46

Background on Jaguar Wright:

Jaguar Wright is an American R&B singer/songwriter. gained prominence in the late 1990s and early 2000s as a backup singer for artists like Ja—Z. She released her debut solo album "Denials, Delusions, and Decisions" which included the hit single "What Ifs

In recent years, she’s made several claims about Diddy.

Allegations Against Diddy:

Wright has made several explosive claims against Diddy in recent interviews and social media posts:

  1. 1. She alleges that Diddy sold a controversial "freak off" party video on the dark web for $500 million

  2. 2. Wright claims this video features high-profile celebrities like Justin Bieber, Chris Brown, Rihanna, Nicki Minaj, and Drake. However, there is no evidence linking these celebrities to any wrongdoing.

  3. 3. She asserts that Diddy sold this video out of desperation for cash

  4. 4. Wright alleges that Diddy's parties involved coercion and violence against women

  5. 5. She claims to have attended some of Diddy's notorious parties and witnessed disturbing behavior


LINKS & SOURCES:

### What’s Going on With That Fake Kim Porter Memoir?

https://www.vulture.com/article/kim-porter-diddy-memoir-explained.html

### Alleged ‘memoir’ from Diddy’s ex-partner Kim Porter pulled from Amazon

https://archive.ph/9sEvO

### Kim Porter’s children say she didn’t write bestselling memoir about Diddy

https://apnews.com/article/kim-porter-memoir-diddy-book-3c1a5120cdb590c3123ebdf8ab1bf0ae

### Kids denounce Christopher Todd's Kim Porter memoir on Instagram:

A post shared by @quincy

Clinton warns of October surprise that will ‘distort and pervert’ Harris
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4906833-clinton-warns-october-surprise-harris/
https://archive.ph/EVLG4

Hillary Clinton warns of efforts to 'distort,' 'pervert' Kamala Harris as election nears
https://www.kfoxtv.com/news/nation-world/hillary-clinton-warns-of-efforts-to-distort-pervert-kamala-harris-as-election-nears-2024-election-2016-election-october-surprise-politics-donald-trump

Hillary Clinton Warns of October Surprise (Video)
https://x.com/CollinRugg/status/1840546311134978370

Link to viral clip of HRC saying misinformation = jail time
https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1835873305670128099

Fact Check: Did Clinton call for jail over misinformation?https://www.dw.com/en/fact-check-did-clinton-call-for-jail-over-misinformation/a-70279863

Stock Monkey (@Gamma_Monkey) “Hillary said the quiet part out loud” post:
https://x.com/Gamma_Monkey/status/1840546997490639309

UNSORTED LINKS & SOURCES + EXTRAS

https://x.com/mommapancakess/status/1841481641857880106

https://www.vulture.com/article/kim-porter-memoir-fake.html

https://www.usnews.com/news/entertainment/articles/2024-10-01/amazon-pulls-kim-porter-memoir-about-sean-diddy-combs-that-her-children-say-is-fake

https://thetab.com/uk/2024/10/02/amazon-removes-fake-memoir-by-ex-wife-of-p-diddy-book-389835

https://apnews.com/article/kim-porter-diddy-memoir-amazon-676550bb63f57b3495b15e658ecf31a1

https://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/wireStory/amazon-pulls-kim-porter-memoir-sean-diddy-combs-114407381

https://www.vulture.com/article/kim-porter-diddy-memoir-explained.html

https://www.hot97.com/news/amazon-pulls-kim-porter-book-amid-controversy-over-wild-diddy-allegations/

https://www.lawyer-monthly.com/2024/09/kim-porters-ex-al-b-sure-requests-fbi-investigate-fictitious-leaked-memoir/

[1] Diddy accused of selling $500M 'Freak Off' dark web video featuring ... https://tribune.com.pk/story/2498179/diddy-accused-of-selling-500m-freak-off-dark-web-video-featuring-justin-bieber-drake-and-more

[2] Diddy selling 'Freak Off' videos on dark web for $500 M featuring ... https://www.hindustantimes.com/entertainment/music/diddy-selling-freak-off-videos-on-dark-web-for-500-m-featuring-justin-bieber-drake-etc-claims-jaguar-wright-101727067458369.html

[3] Diddy's 'Freak Off' Video Involving Famous Celebs Being Sold for ... https://www.inquisitr.com/diddys-freak-off-video-involving-famous-celebs-being-sold-for-500-m-on-dark-web-claims-singer

[4] Meet Jaguar Wright: American Singer Adds to Allegations Against ... https://www.bolnews.com/viral/2024/09/meet-jaguar-wright-american-singer-adds-to-allegations-against-sean-diddy/

[5] These women spoke out about Diddy years ago. Why didn't we listen? https://eu.usatoday.com/story/life/health-wellness/2024/09/24/diddy-women-spoke-out-years-ago-accusations/75351376007/

[6] Who Is Jaguar Wright? The Woman Behind The Controversy https://www.marieclaire.com.au/news/celebrity/who-is-jaguar-wright/

[7] Who Is Jaguar Wright? - Grazia Daily https://graziadaily.co.uk/celebrity/news/who-is-jaguar-wright/

[8] From Singer to Whistleblower: Jaguar Wright Reveals Dark Secrets of the

Industry + Why Has No One Sued Her? | VIDEO https://eurweb.com/2024/jaguar-wright-talks-musics-dark-side-during-diddys-serious-case/

Discussion about this podcast