🔗 ALL my links: LinkTree 🔗
You can watch this video on Bitchute and Rokfin too.
💰SUPPORT MY WORK
If you enjoy my content and would like to support my channel, you can make a donation using any of the following platforms:
- CashApp: $MemoryHold
- Venmo: @MemoryHold
- PayPal: paypal.me/memoryhold7707
- Patreon: patreon.com/Memoryhold] (Support for as little as $1/mo)
- Rokfin: Rokfin.com/memoryhold
🌐 CONNECT WITH ME:
📷 Instagram: @Lil_Falseflag
🎵 TikTok: @MemoryHold1
SHIZOGPT #001 - CRACKING THE PODESTA EMAILS
Below are the notes I used for the ChatGPT demonstration in my video “Schiz0GPT: Cracking the Podesta Emails,” which was live-streamed on 7/20/24. In this video, I use ChatGPT to analyze some of the Podesta Emails, particularly those that conspiracy theorists deemed unusual, suspicious, and potentially coded when they were first released in 2016. I decided to conduct this exercise after one of my Instagram posts went viral, where I shared GPT’s analysis of the sketchy HVAC systems on Epstein’s island that many anons found strange. Initially, I hadn't planned to include my own personal guide since it doesn't present anything particularly new, innovative, or clever (compared to what GPT is capable of, the below is like, basic beginner level prompting, hah). Maybe there’s somebody out there that hasn’t used GPT yet and will find some value in this, who knows. At the least, it lays out my approach to the prompting used in the stream.
Speaking of which, one of the key issues when using ChatGPT for any analysis or fact-finding mission is its tendency to produce egregious inaccuracies, as well as more subtle ones. It often "hallucinates" completely false information and weaves it seamlessly into the accurate information it provides. I wanted to preface all of this by acknowledging these limitations. I am fully aware of ChatGPT’s pitfalls and downsides, knowing that it is not a "crystal ball" and does not know everything. Additionally, I am acutely aware of how prone it is to simply agree with you if prompted correctly. With that said, this was a very basic exercise that does not typically result in such errors. Basic text analysis is pretty much what ChatGPT was made for. Now, if I were inputting past winning lottery numbers into GPT in an attempt to predict the next one, that’s where things might get wonky.
The notes below shed light on how I personally approached using ChatGPT for this task. While not entirely free of bias, I believe it made for a creative and interesting exercise, which could prove to be a useful strategy for those actively researching Pizzagate and other conspiracy theories.
PREVENTING BIAS & PRESERVING OBJECTIVITY:
For best results, we need to first set up some parameters to ensure that the results are not tainted by any biases and/or external influences that may sway GPT’s (ideally) objective analysis of the text we feed it. To do that, I will use the system I’ve developed gradually over time through consistent use of ChatGPT. It’s not perfect, and in fact is not even great - but it’s simple, and easy for anybody to do.
Prerequisites:
I cycle through the below before I prompt ChatGPT to do anything. Simply establish a few objectives that you hope to achieve in your correspondence, and also come up with a general list of questions you have about the text you are sending. Use the objective you set, as well as the questions you have, as your outline to inform the follow-up prompts you will use after GPT first responds.
1.) Establish your objective
• Is your objective to ask ChatGPT whether a certain piece of text is inappropriate or unusual?
• Is your objective to have GPT assist you in determining whether your own personal beliefs/opinions about a particular text or subject (e.g the Podesta Emails) are reasonable and sound?
• Are you asking ChatGPT whether a claim or theory has merit?
• Is your objective to have GPT figure out or clarify certain excerpts of text? Discerning what the author meant by a certain unclear, possibly cryptic, line? (e.g “the realtor found a handkerchief, I think it has a map on it that seems pizza-related…”)
2.) Come up with a general list of questions about the info
• Examples:
“What is a pizza-related map?”
“What does it have to do with a handkerchief?” or “How is that related to a handkerchief?”
“Are handkerchiefs typically considered valuable enough to send via mail when lost?”
“Is it a normal thing for people to mail each other pasta and sauces via the mail?”
“Is the way this author is frustrated about how the sender of the pasta/sauces changed the shape of the box without telling him sound normal? Or is it unusual? Why?”
“Why might somebody be so worked up about the shape of a box someone sent pasta and sauces in?”
“Is there any practical reason that the shape of a box with food in them might directly impact the quality of said food in such a way that would warrant and/or justify the frustration seen in this email, and spark an issue due to them not being told about the change ahead of time?”
The above questions are just some examples of the type of questions you want to keep in the back of your mind as you prompt ChatGPT over time.
Setting Prompt Parameters: Preventing Biases & Ensuring Objectivity
Like I said, the key here is to avoid ChatGPT from viewing the text excerpts of the Podesta Emails as being from the Podesta Emails (or in other words a “debunked right wing conspiracy theory”), which would trigger the typical statements about the harms of misinformation and conspiracy theories. To avoid that, I came up with a strategy that has worked for me personally.
Don’t tell GPT where the text really came from
Rationale: obscuring the text’s true origins avoids triggering GPT and the “censors” around “right wing conspiracy theories”
If it detects that the text may be a product of a conspiracy theory, there’s a high chance that it will be swayed by the “debunked” nature of the text throughout its analysis
I haven’t perfected this, and it likely can recognize infamous texts such as Podesta’s emails, but still, generally avoiding any mention of the text’s origins is best
Have it assume the role of a detective or journalist character - a position in a field that people widely regard as noble and trustworthy
Rationale: By assigning GPT a role such as a detective, it encourages a more comprehensive analysis. This approach may naturally lead GPT to comment on unusual or cryptic language patterns, similar to those found in the Podesta Emails, without explicitly biasing the analysis or directly questioning whether the text is coded.
Obviously it doesn’t have to be a detective or journalist role…in general though, the trick of having it assume any role aside from itself can be extremely useful, as that will directly impact how it responds to you.
Here’s an example prompt:
“Assume the role of a Detective of 15 years turned hard-hitting, truth-seeking investigative independent journalist. You’re at your office when your boss hands you a stack of notebooks, telling you that they were found in the White House, tucked away in an office desk that was once somebody’s, but is now being thrown out. Nothing else is known about them or the text within them - all you have is the text to go on.
You spend some time reading the entries, and it's clear that the text is a written correspondence between multiple people whose names and identities have been [REDACTED]. The date and time of the message entries are visible, however. Overall, there is nothing malicious about the text on their face; in other words, the text is not a totally transparent admission of the author's crimes or anything.
As a trustworthy investigative journalist, I want you to analyze each and every piece of data in the following batches of text in order to figure out everything you can about the communications. No detail is unimportant, whether it’s the wording thats used, the date the entry was written on, and so on. You carefully examine every single dimension of the text for anything that is even slightly off or unusual or strange, no matter how seemingly small.
I will begin sending you the text excerpts as soon as you’re ready.
Any “ChatGPT Pro” (lol) would probably laugh at the above - it’s the lengthiest, most unnecessarily verbose prompt one could come up with. Again, though, I’m just sharing what personally worked for me, and having some fun in the process.
FOLLOW-UP PROMPT
More often than not, the responses GPT comes up with is what will dictate the nature of the question you ask next. While you have your list of questions in the back of your mind, more often then not, ChatGPT’s response will send you down paths that include questions you hadn’t yet thought of. Because of this, the real importance lies in crafting your follow-up prompt.
SOURCES:
Pizza-related map | Source
“*From:* [REDACTED]
*Sent:* Tuesday, September 02, 2014 10:04 AM
*To:* [REDACTED]
*Cc:* [REDACTED]
*Subject:* You left something at the field house
[REDACTED] & [REDACTED]
I just came from checking the Field house and I have a square cloth handkerchief (white w/ black) that was left on the kitchen island.
Happy to send it via the mail if you let me know where I should send it. I also meant to inquire yesterday about the pillows you purchased. I can send them as well, if you let me know where they are in the house.
> Safe travels to all
>
> [REDACTED]”
The text above is then related to other recipients, with the following text added:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“On Sep 2, 2014 2:54 PM, "[REDACTED]" <[REDACTED]@[REDACTED]foundation.org> wrote:
> Hi [REDACTED],
>
>
>
> The realtor found a handkerchief (I think it has a map that seems
> pizza-related. Is it yorus? They can send it if you want. I know you’re
> busy, so feel free not to respond if it’s not yours or you don’t want it.
>
>
>
> [REDACTED]”
Square shaped box + dominos on cheese or with pasta | Source
On Thursday, December 24, 2015, [REDACTED] < [REDACTED]@s [REDACTED]foundation.org>
wrote:
> [REDACTED] & [REDACTED]P
Le!
>
> I think you should give notice when changing strategies which have been
> long in place. I immediately realized something was different by the shape
> of the box and I contemplated who would be sending me something in the
> square shaped box. Lo and behold, instead of pasta and wonderful sauces, it
> was a lovely, tempting assortment of cheeses, Yummy. I am awaiting the
> return of my children and grandchildren from their holiday travels so that
> we can demolish them.
>
> Thank you so much. I hope you and your gang are well.
>
> I miss you both
>
> Best wishes fro a merry Christmas and Happy New Year.
>
> [REDACTED]
>
>
>
> Ps. Do you think I’ll do better playing dominos on cheese than on pasta?
ICE ENCASED WIPER
On Mar 1, 2015, at 4:12 PM, [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> So that's our ice encased wiper and taste of the traffic we are in. Suffice to say we will not make it tonight, I am sad to say. Have to settle for the pasta john gave us at Christmas. Really sorry to miss.
Heated Pools | Source
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 9:26 AM, [REDACTED] < [REDACTED]@ [REDACTED]trusts.org
>> [REDACTED] wrote:
>>
>> With enormous gratitude to Advance Man Extraordinaire Haber, I am popping
>> up again to share our excitement about the Reprise of Our Gang’s visit to
>> the farm in Lovettsville. And I thought I’d share a couple more notes:
>> We plan to heat the pool, so a swim is a possibility. Bonnie will be
>> Uber Service to transport Ruby, Emerson, and Maeve Flubbatto (11, 9, and
>> almost 7) so you’ll have some further entertainment, and they will be in
>> that pool for sure. And with the forecast showing prospects of some sun,
>> and a cooler temp of lower 60s, I suggest you bring sweaters of whatever
>> attire will enable us to use our outdoor table with a pergola overhead so
>> we dine al fresco (and ideally not al-CHILLo).
>>
>>
>>
>> I am ccing Trudy to repeat the invite, and sending pining
>> wishes-you-could-come to Rima, John D, and Laurie & Chris.
>>
>>
>>
>> Con amore, Mrs. Farma
Obama $65,000 for Pizza/Dogs | Source
From: [REDACTED] [mailto:[REDACTED]@[REDACTED].com]
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 2:39 PM
To: '[REDACTED]'
Cc: '[REDACTED]'; '[REDACTED]'; '[REDACTED]'
Subject: RE: Get ready for "Chicago Hot Dog Friday"
I think Obama spent about $65,000 of the tax-payers money flying in
pizza/dogs from Chicago for a private party at the White House not long
ago, assume we are using the same channels?
_______________________________________________________________________________________
TIME FOR DENNY TO VANISH | Source
From: POLITICO Pro [mailto:politicoemail@politicopro.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 5:36 PM
To: [REDACTED]
Subject: Tax Breaking News
The Justice Department on Thursday announced an indictment against former House Speaker Dennis Hastert for allegedly structuring cash transactions to avoid financial reporting rules and lying to the FBI about his conduct.
A grand jury in Illinois charged that Hastert agreed to pay an unnamed individual $3.5 million as part of an effort to conceal "his prior misconduct."
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED]
Date: 2015-05-28 19:36
Subject: FW: Tax Breaking News
Might be time for Denny to vanish to an undisclosed Japanese island.
Denny Hastert + Hellow! | Source
From: [REDACTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 11:12 PM
To: [REDACTED]
Cc: [REDACTED]
Subject: Hellow!
Dear [REDACTED]
How are you? it has been a long time since we we left Nose 49 years ago!
Tonight I was invited to the dinner offered by UN Foundadtion in honor of John.
I met John for the first time and explained to him we enjoyed our camping in Nose, Osaka.
I wish you all the best and hope to see you in the near future.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From:[REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED]
CC: [REDACTED], [REDACTED]
Date: 2015-06-01 13:26
Subject: RE: Hellow!
Dear [REDACTED]
Cant believe its almost 50 years since Camp Nose
I have stayed in touch with denny Hastert and jan ettelt and andy dolan all these years
Its wonderful to reconnect with you
Are you posted in new York?
I would love to see you
I have stayed involved with Japan and do some work for the Japanese Ambassador
Send me your contact information
I look forward to seeing you
Best
[REDACTED]
SEATED WITH THE KIDS; A LITTLE WIRED | Source
From: [REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED]
Date: 2014-01-08 00:38
Subject: Re: You two free for dinner on 12 or 13 January?
Very good
I'm seated with the kids so little wired
“handmade tortillas flown in from Mexico the previous day”, “you should bring all children that are available”
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/26903
From:[REDACTED]@gmail.com
To: [REDACTED]@[REDACTED].org
CC: [REDACTED]@gmail.com
Date: 2014-12-06 08:19
Subject: Re: Invitation: Taco and Tequila cookout on Sunday, December 28
> Dear friends and colleagues,
>
> We will have the third annual cookout at 1837 California Street NW on Sunday, December 28th and we would like you and your partner to be part of it. This year, our party will be taco themed—with fresh, handmade tortillas flown in from Mexico the previous day, an entire suckling pig as well as sides and salsas. We plan to start eating (and drinking) in the early afternoon hours at 3 p.m. Kosher and vegetarian options will be available. We will have a decent selection of white and red wines at hand as well as beer. This is a family friendly event, so you should bring all children that are available. Please let us know if you will join in.
>
> All best, [REDACTED], [REDACTED], [REDACTED]
>
> P.S. Parking is difficult in our neighborhood, Dupont Metro ten minutes by foot. 16th and U Streets bus stop five minutes.
WET WORKS AT THE VINEYARD | Source
(Antonin Scalia)
From: [REDACTED]@[REDACTED].com
To: [REDACTED]@[REDACTED].com
Date: 2016-02-09 20:56
Subject: RE: Thanks
I am all in
Sounds like it will be a bad nite , we all need to buckle up and double down
From: [REDACTED] [[REDACTED]@[REDACTED].com]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2016 4:36 PM
To: [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]@[REDACTED].com>
Subject: Thanks
Didn't think wet works meant pool parties at the Vineyard.
LINKS & SOURCES
1.) Podesta Emails/Pizzagate Pastebin + Archive
• pastebin.com/BX9BCaeC
• archive.ph/NdUaT
OTHER LINKS & SOURCES
🔗 Former Investigator: There's Something Fishy With Antonin Scalia's Death
Share this post